International Transducer Corporation v. United States

36 F.3d 1111, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21298, 1994 WL 467049
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJuly 28, 1994
Docket94-5111
StatusUnpublished

This text of 36 F.3d 1111 (International Transducer Corporation v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
International Transducer Corporation v. United States, 36 F.3d 1111, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21298, 1994 WL 467049 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Opinion

36 F.3d 1111

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
INTERNATIONAL TRANSDUCER CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-5111.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 28, 1994.

30 Fed.Cl. 522.

DISMISSED.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

International Transducer Corp. v. United States
39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,630 (Federal Claims, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 F.3d 1111, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21298, 1994 WL 467049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-transducer-corporation-v-united-states-cafc-1994.