International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc. v. Emig

District Court of Appeal of Florida

International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc. v. Emig

611 So. 2d 1359, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 333, 1993 WL 10848

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 20, 1993

DocketNo. 92-04480

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 611 So. 2d 1359 (International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc. v. Emig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

International Ship Repair & Marine Services, Inc. v. Emig, 611 So. 2d 1359, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 333, 1993 WL 10848 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed a notice of appeal from a nonfinal order determining that it is not entitled to workers’ compensation immunity as a matter of law. The appellant contends that the trial court made its determination based on section 905(a) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act¹ rather than section 440.11 of the Workers’ Compensation Law.² The appellees argue that this appeal should be dismissed because Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(vi) is limited by Mandico v. Taos Construction, Inc., 605 So.2d 850 (Fla.1992), to include only those orders denying immunity under section 440.11. We disagree and interpret the rule to include the order under review.

Motion denied.

RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed a notice of appeal from a nonfinal order determining that it is not entitled to workers’ compensation immunity as a matter of law. The appellant contends that the trial court made its determination based on section 905(a) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act¹ rather than section 440.11 of the Workers’ Compensation Law.² The appellees argue that this appeal should be dismissed because Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(vi) is limited by Mandico v. Taos Construction, Inc., 605 So.2d 850 (Fla.1992), to include only those orders denying immunity under section 440.11. We disagree and interpret the rule to include the order under review.

Motion denied.

RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

611 So. 2d 1359, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 333, 1993 WL 10848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-ship-repair-marine-services-inc-v-emig-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack