International Radiant Corp. v. Intrator
This text of 13 Misc. 2d 443 (International Radiant Corp. v. Intrator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was no competent evidence to establish that the defendant was the owner of the taxicab which caused the damage to plaintiff’s car. The record clearly establishes that a third party was the owner of the vehicle which collided with that owned by plaintiff. (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 11, subd. 3; §§ 12, 61.)
[444]*444The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to defendant and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.
Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Misc. 2d 443, 180 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-radiant-corp-v-intrator-nyappterm-1958.