International Photographers of the Motion Picture Industries, Local 659 of International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture MacHine Operators of United States and Canada v. National Labor Relations Board

477 F.2d 450
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 27, 1973
Docket72-1759
StatusUnpublished

This text of 477 F.2d 450 (International Photographers of the Motion Picture Industries, Local 659 of International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture MacHine Operators of United States and Canada v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
International Photographers of the Motion Picture Industries, Local 659 of International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture MacHine Operators of United States and Canada v. National Labor Relations Board, 477 F.2d 450 (D.C. Cir. 1973).

Opinion

477 F.2d 450

83 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2527, 155 U.S.App.D.C. 281,
71 Lab.Cas. P 13,611

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
International Photographers of the Motion Picture
Industries, Local 659 of International Alliance of
Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture Machine
Operators of United States and Canada, Petitioner
v.
National Labor Relations Board, Respondent.

No. 72-1759.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 27, 1973.

Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, WISDOM* and WILKEY, Circuit Judges.

Order

BAZELON, C.J.

This cause came on to be heard on a petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board and was argued by counsel. On consideration of the foregoing, and for the reasons set forth in the attached memorandum, it is

Ordered and Adjudged by this Court that the aforesaid petition for review is denied and it is

Further Ordered that the cross-application for enforcement of the order of the National Labor Relations Board is granted.

Memorandum

The Board properly refused to give effect to the aborted settlement agreements between the charging parties and the respondent.

A finding of a section 8(b)(1)(A) violation does not require actual proof of intent to influence the exercise of section 7 rights. The Board's inferences concerning the "natural foreseeable consequences of the conduct" were adequately supported by the record. See Lummus Co. v. NLRB, 339 F.2d 728, 734 (D.C.Cir.1964). See also Teamsters Local 357 v. NLRB, 365 U.S. 667, 675 (1961); Radio Officers' Union v. NLRB, 347 U.S. 17, 51 (1954).

Accordingly, the petition for review is denied and the cross-application for enforcement is granted.

*

Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 291(a)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
477 F.2d 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-photographers-of-the-motion-picture-industries-local-659-of-cadc-1973.