International Paper Company v. Bronko F. Jelenic
This text of 200 F.2d 559 (International Paper Company v. Bronko F. Jelenic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case having been heard upon the record, briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties;
And the Court being of the opinion that the appellee was a person entitled to the *560 protection provided by the provisions of the New York Labor Law, Article 11, Section 256, paragraph 1, of Chapter 31 of McKinney’s Consolidated Laws of the State of New York; See Poole v. American Linseed Co., 119 App.Div. 136, 103 N.Y.S. 1047; Duffy v. State, 197 Misc. 569, 94 N.Y.S.2d 757, 761; Racine v. Morris, 201 N.Y. 240, 245-246, 94 N.E. 864;
And that the trial judge was not in error in ruling that the machine involved in the accident was not in the course of construction within the ruling of Foster v. International Paper Company, 71 App.Div. 47, 75 N.Y.S. 610, but was, in its then operative condition, a type of machine requiring a guard; See Continental Public Works Co. v. Stein, 2 Cir., 232 F. 559;
And no prejudicial error appearing in the Court’s charge to the jury;
It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 F.2d 559, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-paper-company-v-bronko-f-jelenic-ca6-1952.