International Paper Co. v. Pennington
This text of 588 F.2d 93 (International Paper Co. v. Pennington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER:
Because of the allegations of judicial misconduct contained in the petition for rehearing, the panel has decided that the rehearing should be granted, that the previous panel opinion, 581 F.2d 520, should be vacated, and that leave to appeal should be granted.
No member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 16) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED. •
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
588 F.2d 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-paper-co-v-pennington-ca5-1978.