International Paper Co. v. Miller

947 P.2d 1132, 151 Or. App. 131, 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 1482
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 22, 1997·No. WCB 96-03652; CA A96000·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Employer seeks judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board’s order adopting and affirming an order of the administrative law judge (ALJ) setting aside employer’s denial of claimant’s low back aggravation claim. Employer argues that the ALJ and, by extension, the Board erroneously assumed that proof of a symtomatic worsening, as opposed to a pathological worsening, of claimant’s condition was sufficient to establish the statutorily required “actual worsening of the compensable condition.” ORS 656.273d).1 We agree with employer. SAIF v. Walker, 145 Or App 294, 930 P2d 230 (1996), rev allowed 325 Or 367 (1997). This case is in the same substantive and procedural posture as Walker. Accordingly, we remand for the Board to apply the appropriate standard.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

International Paper Co. v. Miller, 947 P.2d 1132, 151 Or. App. 131, 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 1482 (Or. Ct. App. 1997).

947 P.2d 1132 (International Paper Co. v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SAIF Corp. v. Walker
930 P.2d 230 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)