International Paper Co. v. Cress
This text of 801 P.2d 903 (International Paper Co. v. Cress) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Employer International Paper Company petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming the referee’s holdings that employer and not Station House and its insurer, SAIF, is responsible for claimant’s wrist injury, and that claimant had demonstrated “good cause” for her failure to file her request for hearing within 60 days after notification of employer’s denial. ORS 656.319(1)(b).1 The only issue on review is good cause. We affirm.
Employer issued a denial of claimant’s wrist injury claim on August 14, 1986, by certified mail. Claimant was in the process of moving and had asked her mother to pick up her mail for her. Although the return receipt bears a signature purporting to be claimant’s, she testified that she did not sign it. According to her, it was either her mother or her sister who signed the receipt. The Board found that she did not know about the denial until late October, 1986. Her request for hearing was filed on November 3, 1986, which was more than 60 days, but less than 180 days, after the denial was mailed.
Employer argues that the lack of actual notice does not constitute “good cause.” Notwithstanding that, under ORS 656.319(1), notification occurs when a denial is mailed, the time for requesting a hearing may be extended for good cause. Lack of actual notice may constitute good cause. There is substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding, and its finding supports its conclusion that claimant had “good cause” for filing a late request for hearing. Giusti Wine Co. v. Adams, 102 Or App 329, 332, 794 P2d 451 (1990).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
801 P.2d 903, 104 Or. App. 496, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 1602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-paper-co-v-cress-orctapp-1990.