International Paper Co. v. Comstock

Court of Appeals of Oregon

International Paper Co. v. Comstock

697 P.2d 1391, 73 Or. App. 342, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2848

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 17, 1985

Docket82-07496; CA A32907

StatusPublished

This text of 697 P.2d 1391 (International Paper Co. v. Comstock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

International Paper Co. v. Comstock, 697 P.2d 1391, 73 Or. App. 342, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2848 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board which affirmed the referee’s decision that claimant’s worsened cervical condition is compensable. Claimant injured his back while working for employer. He subsequently left that employment, became self-employed and elected not to be covered by workers’ compensation insurance. During his self-employment, he experienced increased back problems and underwent corrective surgery.

The referee and the Board determined that the test for compensability found in Grable v. Weyerhaeuser Company, 291 Or 387, 631 P2d 768 (1981), is the appropriate rule. Employer argues that the last injurious exposure rule explained in Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or 238, 675 P2d 1044 (1984), should be applied, even though claimant was self-employed and not covered by workers’ compensation insurance. It concedes that we rejected an identical contention in Peterson v. Eugene F. Burrill Lumber, 57 Or App 476, 645 P2d 567 (1982), aff’d 294 Or 537, 660 P2d 1058 (1983), but argues that that case is wrong and should be overruled. We are not persuaded by employer’s arguments.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board which affirmed the referee’s decision that claimant’s worsened cervical condition is compensable. Claimant injured his back while working for employer. He subsequently left that employment, became self-employed and elected not to be covered by workers’ compensation insurance. During his self-employment, he experienced increased back problems and underwent corrective surgery.

The referee and the Board determined that the test for compensability found in Grable v. Weyerhaeuser Company, 291 Or 387, 631 P2d 768 (1981), is the appropriate rule. Employer argues that the last injurious exposure rule explained in Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or 238, 675 P2d 1044 (1984), should be applied, even though claimant was self-employed and not covered by workers’ compensation insurance. It concedes that we rejected an identical contention in Peterson v. Eugene F. Burrill Lumber, 57 Or App 476, 645 P2d 567 (1982), aff’d 294 Or 537, 660 P2d 1058 (1983), but argues that that case is wrong and should be overruled. We are not persuaded by employer’s arguments.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

697 P.2d 1391, 73 Or. App. 342, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-paper-co-v-comstock-orctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack