International Norcent Technology v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics

323 F. App'x 571

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Footnotes

•

**

We review de novo the district court’s order dismissing Nor cent’s complaint for failure to state a claim, taking the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construing them in a light favorable to plaintiff. Les Shockley Racing, Inc. v. Nat’l Hot Rod Ass’n, 884 F.2d 504, 507 (9th Cir.1989). Norcent did not plead facts with adequate specificity to state a claim. See Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007); Kendall v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., 518 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir.2008).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.