International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio v. Joseph Sureck
This text of 736 F.2d 1340 (International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio v. Joseph Sureck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
736 F.2d 1340
INTERNATIONAL LADIES' GARMENT WORKERS' UNION, AFL-CIO, et
al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Joseph SURECK, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 80-5035, 80-5054, 80-5152 and 80-5153.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
July 5, 1984.
Henry R. Fenton, Levy & Goldman, Los Angeles, Cal., Michael Kantor, Manatt, Phelps, Rothenberg & Tunney, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Lawrence B. Gotlieb, Molly Munger, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
Before ANDERSON and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and MUECKE, District Judge.*
ORDER
By its decision of April 17, 1984, the Supreme Court of the United States, in Immigration and Naturalization Service, et al., v. Delgado, et al., --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1758, 80 L.Ed.2d 247, reversed the decision of this court reported at 681 F.2d 624. Accordingly, we vacate our decision and remand to the district court for proceedings not inconsistent with the decision of the United States Supreme Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Honorable C.A. Muecke, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
736 F.2d 1340, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-ladies-garment-workers-union-afl-cio-v-joseph-sureck-ca9-1984.