International Harvester Co. of America v. Still
53 So. 394, 98 Miss. 127
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Appellees ’ rights, whatever they may be under the allegations of the bill, could have been enforced in the suit at law, the prosecution of which it is sought to enjoin. The chancellor, therefore, erred in overruling the motion to dissolve the injunction.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
International Harvester Co. of America v. Still, 53 So. 394, 98 Miss. 127 (Mich. 1910).
53 So. 394 (International Harvester Co. of America v. Still) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.