International Harvest Hat Co. v. United States
This text of 24 Cust. Ct. 365 (International Harvest Hat Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
At the trial plaintiff’s witness, referring to a sample of the involved merchandise testified that: "This hat is not bleached, supposedly not. * * * X Q. You don’t know whether it is bleached or not then? — A. No. I wasn’t there.” The testimony adduced from the one witness called for the defendant tended to support the classification made by the collector. Upon an examination of the record the court was satisfied that the plaintiff failed to establish a 'prima facie case. The protest was therefore overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 Cust. Ct. 365, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-harvest-hat-co-v-united-states-cusc-1950.