International G. N. R. Co. v. Tate

170 S.W. 1061, 1914 Tex. App. LEXIS 1017
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 28, 1914
DocketNo. 5387.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 170 S.W. 1061 (International G. N. R. Co. v. Tate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
International G. N. R. Co. v. Tate, 170 S.W. 1061, 1914 Tex. App. LEXIS 1017 (Tex. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

JENKINS, J.

The only assignments of error in this ease relate to the charges given and the special charges requested and refused.

[1] There is no bill of exception in tbe record relating to tbe action of the court in these matters, for which reasons none of appellant’s assignments can be considered. Art. 2061.

[2] There is in the record what purports to be “objections of defendant .to the court’s charge.” But this cannot he treated as a bill of exceptions. It does not appear to have been presented to the judge trying the case (article 2063, R. S.), and there is nothing in ■the record to show that the court’s attention was ever called to such objections (Railway Co. v. Battle, 169 S. W. 1048, and Railway Co. v. Feldman, 170 S. W. 133, not yet officially reported).

For .the reasons stated, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

RICE, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States & Mexican Trust Co. v. Austin
176 S.W. 87 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Graham
175 S.W. 472 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 S.W. 1061, 1914 Tex. App. LEXIS 1017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-g-n-r-co-v-tate-texapp-1914.