International Fidelity Insurance v. People

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

International Fidelity Insurance v. People

271 A.D.2d 446, 708 N.Y.S.2d 296, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3798

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 446 (International Fidelity Insurance v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

International Fidelity Insurance v. People, 271 A.D.2d 446, 708 N.Y.S.2d 296, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPL 540.30 for the remission of a forfeiture of bail, International Fidelity Insurance Company, as surety, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cutrona, J.), entered March 26, 1999, which denied its motion to remit the forfeiture of bail of its principal, Kato Jenkins, and to vacate the judgment entered thereon.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant did not move for remission of the forfeiture of bail until more than a year after the order directing the bail to be forfeited was entered. Thus, the appellant’s application for remission of the forfeited bail was properly denied as untimely pursuant to CPL 540.30 (2) (see, People v Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co., 37 NY2d 606; People v Cotto, 262 AD2d 138).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J. P., H. Miller, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPL 540.30 for the remission of a forfeiture of bail, International Fidelity Insurance Company, as surety, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cutrona, J.), entered March 26, 1999, which denied its motion to remit the forfeiture of bail of its principal, Kato Jenkins, and to vacate the judgment entered thereon.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant did not move for remission of the forfeiture of bail until more than a year after the order directing the bail to be forfeited was entered. Thus, the appellant’s application for remission of the forfeited bail was properly denied as untimely pursuant to CPL 540.30 (2) (see, People v Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co., 37 NY2d 606; People v Cotto, 262 AD2d 138).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J. P., H. Miller, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 446, 708 N.Y.S.2d 296, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-fidelity-insurance-v-people-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack