International Drug Co. v. Grecian

Supreme Court of Kansas

International Drug Co. v. Grecian

112 P. 167, 83 Kan. 809, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 262

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedDecember 10, 1910

DocketNo. 16,703

StatusPublished

This text of 112 P. 167 (International Drug Co. v. Grecian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

International Drug Co. v. Grecian, 112 P. 167, 83 Kan. 809, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 262 (kan 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The only ground urged for reversal is that the decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary t-' law. Very little evidence was necessary, in view of the defendant’s admission that he executed the order for the goods,, received and retained them, and refused to pay for them. The only principle of law discussed relates to the necessity for the performance of a condition precedent, but the agreement of the plaintiff to advertise the goods was not such a condition. The court allowed the defendant to recoup his damages sustained by reason of the failure of the plaintiff to advertise the goods, and the defendant has no just complaint of the decision.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The only ground urged for reversal is that the decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary t-' law. Very little evidence was necessary, in view of the defendant’s admission that he executed the order for the goods,, received and retained them, and refused to pay for them. The only principle of law discussed relates to the necessity for the performance of a condition precedent, but the agreement of the plaintiff to advertise the goods was not such a condition. The court allowed the defendant to recoup his damages sustained by reason of the failure of the plaintiff to advertise the goods, and the defendant has no just complaint of the decision.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 P. 167, 83 Kan. 809, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-drug-co-v-grecian-kan-1910.