International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades v. Pisciarino
This text of 170 A.D.2d 1011 (International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades v. Pisciarino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Respondents have failed to show any ground for vacating the arbitration award (see, CPLR 7511 [b] [1]). The collective bargaining agreement gave the Joint Trade Board, acting as arbitrator, the power to interpret the agreement and its interpretation may not be set aside by the court unless it is completely irrational (see, Matter of National Cash Register Co. [Wilson], 8 NY2d 377, 383). The Board’s interpretation that the agreement was binding upon respondent Pisciarino because he was a stockholder and officer of a party to the agreement when it was executed and that he was bound for the full term of the agreement was not entirely irrational.
The award of $12,000 was not punitive, but was designed to compensate petitioner for the loss its members would suffer by reason of respondents’ violation of the contract. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Mordue, J.— Arbitration.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 A.D.2d 1011, 566 N.Y.S.2d 164, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-brotherhood-of-painters-allied-trades-v-pisciarino-nyappdiv-1991.