International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 323 v. Richway

District Court of Appeal of Florida

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 323 v. Richway

436 So. 2d 374, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22579

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 17, 1983·No. No. 82-2573·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order imposing a temporary injunction. We affirm upon authority of Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County, 436 U.S. 180, 98 S.Ct. 1745, 56 L.Ed.2d 209 (1978), whose rationale is buttressed by the fact that the National Labor Relations Board had earlier determined: (1) that the conduct of Richway and its state court application were not violations of the National Labor Relations Act, and (2) that the appellants’ complaint filed before us be dismissed thereby indicating that it would not provide a forum for this dispute.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order imposing a temporary injunction. We affirm upon authority of Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County, 436 U.S. 180, 98 S.Ct. 1745, 56 L.Ed.2d 209 (1978), whose rationale is buttressed by the fact that the National Labor Relations Board had earlier determined: (1) that the conduct of Richway and its state court application were not violations of the National Labor Relations Act, and (2) that the appellants’ complaint filed before us be dismissed thereby indicating that it would not provide a forum for this dispute.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 323 v. Richway, 436 So. 2d 374, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22579 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

436 So. 2d 374 (International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 323 v. Richway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related