International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers v. Hardeman

398 U.S. 926, 90 S. Ct. 1816, 26 L. Ed. 2d 88, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 3542, 74 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2240
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers v. Hardeman. Read the opinion of the Court — 401 U.S. 233
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 25, 1970·No. No. 1392·Published

Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-[927]*927tiorari granted limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition which read as follows:

“1. Whether a federal court in a Section 102 proceeding reviewing an expulsion of a member by a union may apply a standard of review whereby the court substitutes its own factual findings and interpretations of the union’s constitution and by-laws for those of the union.”
“3, Whether the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, preempts an action brought under Section 102 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act wherein a former union member, claiming wrongful expulsion, does not seek restoration of membership rights but claims damages for an alleged loss of employment due to the union’s alleged failure to refer him to employers.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers v. Hardeman, 398 U.S. 926, 90 S. Ct. 1816, 26 L. Ed. 2d 88, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 3542, 74 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2240 (1970).

398 U.S. 926 (International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers v. Hardeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.