International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers, Local 66, Afl-Cio v. Leona Lee Insulation and Specialties, Inc.

516 F.2d 504, 20 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1116, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 13478
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 25, 1975
Docket74-2748
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 516 F.2d 504 (International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers, Local 66, Afl-Cio v. Leona Lee Insulation and Specialties, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers, Local 66, Afl-Cio v. Leona Lee Insulation and Specialties, Inc., 516 F.2d 504, 20 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1116, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 13478 (5th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the District Court’s Order dismissing with prejudice because of the failure of appellant’s (Leona Lee Corporation) counsel to appear at the time the case was scheduled for trial. We see nothing to be served by setting out the lengthy history and facts. It suffices that this is a case in which a *505 too busy lawyer and a too busy Judge were trying to communicate through legitimate intermediaries with a resulting series of misunderstandings that in retrospect ought not to have occurred but which lack any suggestion of contumacious indifference to the Court of the kind we generally regard as requisite to the use of this severe sanction. See, e. g., Brown v. Thompson, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 1214 and Durham v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, 5 Cir., 1967, 385 F.2d 366. Cf. Brown v. O’Leary, 5 Cir., 1975, 512 F.2d 485.

The interests of justice call for a reversal and remand with directions to reinstate the case for expedited disposition, but in doing so the District Court shall assess costs against Leona Lee Corporation, for whatever costs and expenses were incurred by appellee in having its witnesses and counsel present at the scheduled time of trial.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prince v. Stewart
580 F.3d 571 (Seventh Circuit, 2009)
Dimuccio v. D'Ambra
779 F. Supp. 1318 (M.D. Florida, 1991)
Knox v. Lichtenstein
654 F.2d 19 (Eighth Circuit, 1981)
Bagalay v. Lahaina Restoration Foundation
588 P.2d 416 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
516 F.2d 504, 20 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1116, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 13478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-association-of-heat-and-frost-insulators-and-asbestos-ca5-1975.