International Artware Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

International Artware Corp. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 902, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1809

United States Customs Court·Decided June 22, 1967·No. No. P67/213; protests 64/17884, etc. (Cleveland)·Published

Opinion

Landis.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), and that the items of merchandise marked “D” consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.B. Co. a/o United China do Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Landis.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), and that the items of merchandise marked “D” consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.B. Co. a/o United China do Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

International Artware Corp. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 902, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1809 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

58 Cust. Ct. 902 (International Artware Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related