Internal Revenue Service of United States v. Hollander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Internal Revenue Service of United States v. Hollander

119 A.D.2d 824, 501 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55765

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 119 A.D.2d 824 (Internal Revenue Service of United States v. Hollander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Internal Revenue Service of United States v. Hollander, 119 A.D.2d 824, 501 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPL 190.25 (4) and Judiciary Law § 325 for the release of Grand Jury minutes, etc., the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.), entered October 8, 1985, which authorized the release of certain Grand Jury materials.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The court did not abuse its discretion by directing the release of certain Grand Jury materials since the petitioners established a compelling and particularized need for the release of those materials (see, Matter of District Attorney of Suffolk County, 58 NY2d 436, 444). Rubin, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPL 190.25 (4) and Judiciary Law § 325 for the release of Grand Jury minutes, etc., the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.), entered October 8, 1985, which authorized the release of certain Grand Jury materials.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The court did not abuse its discretion by directing the release of certain Grand Jury materials since the petitioners established a compelling and particularized need for the release of those materials (see, Matter of District Attorney of Suffolk County, 58 NY2d 436, 444). Rubin, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A.D.2d 824, 501 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/internal-revenue-service-of-united-states-v-hollander-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack