Internal Medicine Associates of Jacksonville v. Rathburn

855 So. 2d 661, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12984, 2003 WL 22023677
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 29, 2003
DocketNo. 1D03-0666
StatusPublished

This text of 855 So. 2d 661 (Internal Medicine Associates of Jacksonville v. Rathburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Internal Medicine Associates of Jacksonville v. Rathburn, 855 So. 2d 661, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12984, 2003 WL 22023677 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

WOLF, C.J.

We deny the petition for writ of certio-rari because the trial court’s orders granting Dr. Chris Rathburn’s motions to compel do not depart from the essential requirements of the law. See Transmark, USA, Inc. v. State, Department of Ins., 631 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We note that, while they are arguably unclear, our reading of the trial court’s orders allows petitioners to withhold for later in camera review all accountant-client and attorney-client privileged materials relating to the instant litigation.

LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Transmark, USA, Inc. v. State, Department of Insurance
631 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
855 So. 2d 661, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12984, 2003 WL 22023677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/internal-medicine-associates-of-jacksonville-v-rathburn-fladistctapp-2003.