Internal Medicine Associates of Jacksonville v. Rathburn

855 So. 2d 661, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12984, 2003 WL 22023677
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 29, 2003·No. No. 1D03-0666·Published

Opinion

WOLF, C.J.

We deny the petition for writ of certio-rari because the trial court’s orders granting Dr. Chris Rathburn’s motions to compel do not depart from the essential requirements of the law. See Transmark, USA, Inc. v. State, Department of Ins., 631 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We note that, while they are arguably unclear, our reading of the trial court’s orders allows petitioners to withhold for later in camera review all accountant-client and attorney-client privileged materials relating to the instant litigation.

LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Internal Medicine Associates of Jacksonville v. Rathburn, 855 So. 2d 661, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12984, 2003 WL 22023677 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

855 So. 2d 661 (Internal Medicine Associates of Jacksonville v. Rathburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Transmark, USA, Inc. v. State, Department of Insurance
631 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)