Internal Medicine Associates of Jacksonville v. Rathburn
This text of 855 So. 2d 661 (Internal Medicine Associates of Jacksonville v. Rathburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We deny the petition for writ of certio-rari because the trial court’s orders granting Dr. Chris Rathburn’s motions to compel do not depart from the essential requirements of the law. See Transmark, USA, Inc. v. State, Department of Ins., 631 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We note that, while they are arguably unclear, our reading of the trial court’s orders allows petitioners to withhold for later in camera review all accountant-client and attorney-client privileged materials relating to the instant litigation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
855 So. 2d 661, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12984, 2003 WL 22023677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/internal-medicine-associates-of-jacksonville-v-rathburn-fladistctapp-2003.