Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 18, 2012

Docket2011-1296

StatusUnpublished

This text of Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc. (Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PALM, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________

2011-1296 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 09-CV-0272, Judge Sue L. Robinson. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

CARSON P. VEACH, Freeborn & Peters, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were DAVID S. BECKER and JACOB D. KOERING.

ROBERT T. HASLAM, Covington & Burling LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, argued for defendant- appellee. With him on the brief were MICHAEL M. MARKMAN and ROBERT WILLIAMS of San Francisco, California. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 18, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI