Intermatic Inc. v. Lamson & Sessions Co.

154 L. Ed. 2d 423, 123 S. Ct. 549, 537 U.S. 1016, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 8323, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 12844, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11078, 71 U.S.L.W. 3337
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 12, 2002·No. 02-193·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 535 U. S. 722 (2002).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Intermatic Inc. v. Lamson & Sessions Co., 154 L. Ed. 2d 423, 123 S. Ct. 549, 537 U.S. 1016, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 8323, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 12844, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11078, 71 U.S.L.W. 3337 (U.S. 2002).

154 L. Ed. 2d 423 (Intermatic Inc. v. Lamson & Sessions Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wyeth v. Sandoz, Inc.
570 F. Supp. 2d 815 (E.D. North Carolina, 2008)
Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc.
247 F. Supp. 2d 1233 (D. Kansas, 2003)
Intermatic Inc. v. Lamson & Sessions Co.
55 F. App'x 544 (Federal Circuit, 2003)