Interiors Importing Corp. v. Kaiser

243 A.D. 598

Opinion

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements and motion granted. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Townley and Untermyer, JJ.; O’Malley, J., dissents and votes for affirmance on the ground that the second cause of action for necessaries is not entitled to a preference under the rule.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Interiors Importing Corp. v. Kaiser, 243 A.D. 598 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

243 A.D. 598 (Interiors Importing Corp. v. Kaiser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.