Interior Lumber Co. v. O'Dowd

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Interior Lumber Co. v. O'Dowd

169 N.W. 790, 141 Minn. 498, 1918 Minn. LEXIS 429

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 20, 1918

DocketNo. 21,114

StatusPublished

This text of 169 N.W. 790 (Interior Lumber Co. v. O'Dowd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Interior Lumber Co. v. O'Dowd, 169 N.W. 790, 141 Minn. 498, 1918 Minn. LEXIS 429 (Mich. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $28.30, alleged to be the balance due plaintiff from defendant upon an account for lumber sold.

Defendant sought to escape liability on the ground that he had been charged for more lumber than he received, the alleged overcharge being the amount here in controversy, and upon the further ground that there was a dispute as to two small items in plaintiff’s bill and that plaintiff agreed to receive in full payment and satisfaction of its claim $677.95', which sum defendant paid and plaintiff accepted.

There was a verdict for plaintiff and a motion for a new trial, which was denied. The appeal is from the order denying such motion. The evidence was sufficient to justify the verdict and we find that no errors of law occurred at the trial.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $28.30, alleged to be the balance due plaintiff from defendant upon an account for lumber sold.

Defendant sought to escape liability on the ground that he had been charged for more lumber than he received, the alleged overcharge being the amount here in controversy, and upon the further ground that there was a dispute as to two small items in plaintiff’s bill and that plaintiff agreed to receive in full payment and satisfaction of its claim $677.95', which sum defendant paid and plaintiff accepted.

There was a verdict for plaintiff and a motion for a new trial, which was denied. The appeal is from the order denying such motion. The evidence was sufficient to justify the verdict and we find that no errors of law occurred at the trial.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 N.W. 790, 141 Minn. 498, 1918 Minn. LEXIS 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interior-lumber-co-v-odowd-minn-1918.