Interim Holdings, L.L.C. v. Warmann

85 S.W.3d 95, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1639, 2002 WL 1792515
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 6, 2002
DocketNos. ED 79116, ED 79731
StatusPublished

This text of 85 S.W.3d 95 (Interim Holdings, L.L.C. v. Warmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Interim Holdings, L.L.C. v. Warmann, 85 S.W.3d 95, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1639, 2002 WL 1792515 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Interim Holdings, L.L.C. (hereinafter, “Interim”) appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing its creditor’s bill in equity filed against Argosy Gaming Company and Floyd C. Warmann (hereinafter, “War-mann”). Interim also appeals from a declaratory judgment holding that Interim lacks standing to enforce a judgment entered against Warmann.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the motion court’s decision was supported by substantial evidence on the record, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. McDermott v. Carnahan, 934 S.W.2d 285, 287 (Mo. banc 1996). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDermott v. Carnahan
934 S.W.2d 285 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 S.W.3d 95, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1639, 2002 WL 1792515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interim-holdings-llc-v-warmann-moctapp-2002.