INTEREST RECOVERY, INC. AND WILLIAM CRESCENZO v. LEONARD S. HUDSON

District Court of Appeal of Florida

INTEREST RECOVERY, INC. AND WILLIAM CRESCENZO v. LEONARD S. HUDSON

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 23, 2018

Docket17-2879

StatusPublished

This text of INTEREST RECOVERY, INC. AND WILLIAM CRESCENZO v. LEONARD S. HUDSON (INTEREST RECOVERY, INC. AND WILLIAM CRESCENZO v. LEONARD S. HUDSON) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

INTEREST RECOVERY, INC. AND WILLIAM CRESCENZO v. LEONARD S. HUDSON, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

INTEREST RECOVERY, INC., and ) WILLIAM CRESCENZO; ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2879 ) PAT FRANK, AS CLERK OF ) COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH ) JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ) HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY; ) SHEILA M. HENSLEY; JORGE L. ) DE LA BARRA; et. al., ) ) Appellees. ) )

Opinion filed March 23, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Laurel M. Lee, Judge.

Ann M. Allison of Allison Law Group, Tampa, for Appellants.

David M. Caldevilla and Donald C.P. Greiwe of de la Parte & Gilbert, P.A., Tampa; and Dale K. Bohner, General Counsel for the Clerk, Tampa, for Appellee Pat Frank, Clerk of the Court.

No appearance for remaining Appellees. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI