Interest of W.E.
Opinion
Filed 12/7/00 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2000 ND 113
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Leslie Allen Lunstad, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20000113
Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Burt L. Riskedahl, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ladd Ronald Erickson, Assistant State’s Attorney, 210 2nd Avenue NW, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for plaintiff and appellee.
Robert Wade Martin, P.O. Box 2324, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2324, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Lunstad
No. 20000113
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Leslie Allen Lunstad appealed from a judgment of conviction, entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of surreptitious intrusion in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-22-03.1. On appeal, Lunstad asserts there is not substantial evidence to support the jury verdict and the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the prosecution to exceed the permissible scope of closing argument. The judgment of conviction is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2000 ND 208 (Interest of W.E.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.