Interest of T.E.
Opinion
FILED
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
JULY 7, 2022
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2022 ND 133
In the Interest of T.E.
Adam Miller, PsyD, Petitioner and Appellee v.
T.E., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20220171
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Stephannie N. Stiel, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jason Van Horn, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.
Interest of T.E. No. 20220171
Per Curiam.
[¶1] T.E. appeals from an order for hospitalization and an order for involuntary treatment with prescribed medication. T.E. argues the district court erred in finding he is mentally ill and a person requiring treatment. He also argues the court erred in granting the request for involuntary treatment with medication. We conclude the court’s findings are not clearly erroneous. See In re S.R.B., 2013 ND 109, ¶ 7, 832 N.W.2d 42 (the more probing clearly erroneous standard of review applies to factual findings made by the district court in appeals from an order for hospitalization and treatment). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2022 ND 133 (Interest of T.E.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.