Interest of T.B.

2011 ND 89
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided May 11, 2011·No. 20100267·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Filed 5/11/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2011 ND 82

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Aaron James Erhart,

a/k/a Aaron James Erhardt, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20100384

Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jackson J. Lofgren, Assistant State’s Attorney, Morton County Courthouse, 210 Second Avenue NW, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for plaintiff and appellee.

Mark T. Blumer, 341 Central Avenue North, Suite 3, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, N.D. 58072, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Erhart

No. 20100384

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Aaron Erhart appeals from the judgment entered by the district court after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition.  Erhart argues the State’s evidence was insufficient to sustain the guilty verdict.  We summarily affirm the district court’s judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Interest of T.B., 2011 ND 89 (N.D. 2011).

2011 ND 89 (Interest of T.B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Erhart
2011 ND 82 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2011)