Interest of R.V.F. v. O.T.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Interest of R.V.F. v. O.T.

31 S.W.3d 516, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1706

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 14, 2000

DocketNo. ED 77489

StatusPublished

This text of 31 S.W.3d 516 (Interest of R.V.F. v. O.T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Interest of R.V.F. v. O.T., 31 S.W.3d 516, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1706 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

O.T. (Mother) appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to set aside the judgment terminating Mother’s parental rights. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not against the weight of the evidence. In the Interest of M.R. and E.R., 894 S.W.2d 193, 195 (Mo.App. E.D.1995); Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

O.T. (Mother) appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to set aside the judgment terminating Mother’s parental rights. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not against the weight of the evidence. In the Interest of M.R. and E.R., 894 S.W.2d 193, 195 (Mo.App. E.D.1995); Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 S.W.3d 516, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-rvf-v-ot-moctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack