Interest of R.V.F. v. O.T.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Interest of R.V.F. v. O.T.

31 S.W.3d 516, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1706

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 14, 2000·No. No. ED 77489·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

O.T. (Mother) appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to set aside the judgment terminating Mother’s parental rights. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not against the weight of the evidence. In the Interest of M.R. and E.R., 894 S.W.2d 193, 195 (Mo.App. E.D.1995); Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

O.T. (Mother) appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to set aside the judgment terminating Mother’s parental rights. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not against the weight of the evidence. In the Interest of M.R. and E.R., 894 S.W.2d 193, 195 (Mo.App. E.D.1995); Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Interest of R.V.F. v. O.T., 31 S.W.3d 516, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1706 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

31 S.W.3d 516 (Interest of R.V.F. v. O.T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related