Interest of R.S.
This text of 2022 ND 48 (Interest of R.S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MARCH 3, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2022 ND 48
In the Interest of R.S.
William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee v. R.S., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20220039
Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Mark T. Blumer, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Leo A. Ryan, Special Assistant Attorney General, Jamestown, ND for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief. Interest of R.S. No. 20220039
[¶1] R.S. appeals from a district court’s continuing treatment order. He argues the evidence does not support the court’s findings that he is a mentally ill individual requiring treatment. We conclude the court’s findings are not clearly erroneous. See Interest of Doe, 2019 ND 23, ¶ 4, 921 N.W.2d 403 (the more probing clearly erroneous standard of review applies to factual findings made by the district court in N.D.C.C. ch. 25-03.1 civil commitment proceedings). We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2022 ND 48, 971 N.W.2d 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-rs-nd-2022.