Interest of R.S.
Opinion
Filed 03/19/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2020 ND 60
In the Interest of R.S.
William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee v.
R.S., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20200045
Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Mark T. Blumer, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Leo A. Ryan, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.
Interest of R.S. No. 20200045
Per Curiam.
[¶1] R.S. appeals from the district court’s order granting the request for continuing treatment. R.S. argues that there lacked clear and convincing evidence to support he was mentally ill and required treatment as mandated by N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-02. We conclude the district court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We affirm under N.D.R.App.35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2020 ND 60 (Interest of R.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.