Interest of R.C.

2018 ND 106, 910 N.W.2d 860
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided May 8, 2018·No. 20180090·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*861 [¶1] T.V. and C.C., the mother and father of R.C., appeal from a juvenile court order terminating their parental rights. The juvenile court found the child was deprived, the conditions and causes of the deprivation were likely to continue, and the child was suffering or would probably suffer serious harm in the future. On appeal, T.V. and C.C. argue there was not clear and convincing evidence to support a termination of their parental rights. The juvenile court's findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Interest of R.C., 2018 ND 106, 910 N.W.2d 860 (N.D. 2018).

2018 ND 106 (Interest of R.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Vaage v. State
2016 ND 32 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2016)
Sweeney v. Kirby
2015 ND 148 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2015)