Interest of P.T.D., C.R.D., P.A.D., P.P.D., & N.A.D.

2019 ND 3
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 2019
Docket20180192
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2019 ND 3 (Interest of P.T.D., C.R.D., P.A.D., P.P.D., & N.A.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Interest of P.T.D., C.R.D., P.A.D., P.P.D., & N.A.D., 2019 ND 3 (N.D. 2019).

Opinion

Filed 1/15/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2019 ND 3

In the Interest of P.T.D., a child

State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

P.T.D., child, and T.P.D., father,                                                                 Respondents

        and

A.R.D., mother, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20180192

In the Interest of C.R.D., a child

C.R.D., child, and T.P.D., father,                                                           Respondents

No. 20180193

In the Interest of P.A.D., a child

P.A.D., child, and T.P.D., father,                                                           Respondents

No. 20180194

In the Interest of P.P.D., a child

P.P.D., child, and T.P.D., father,                                                           Respondents

No. 20180195

In the Interest of N.A.D., a child

N.A.D., child, and T.P.D., father,                                                           Respondents

No. 20180196

Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Jay A. Schmitz, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Frederick R. Fremgen, State’s Attorney, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee.

Kiara Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant.

Interest of P.T.D., C.R.D., P.A.D., P.P.D., and N.A.D.

Nos. 20180192-20180196

[¶1] A.D. appeals from a juvenile court order finding her five children to be deprived.  On appeal, A.D. argues the juvenile court erred by finding the children to be deprived because the unsanitary and dangerous household has been cured by a move to a new home, any drug issues are now under control, there was no evidence she used drugs around the children, and the record does not contain any evidence her actions have negatively affected the children.  We conclude the juvenile court’s findings are not clearly erroneous.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Interest of P.T.D.
2019 ND 3 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 ND 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-ptd-crd-pad-ppd-nad-nd-2019.