Interest of M.S.H.
This text of 2018 ND 191 (Interest of M.S.H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 8/1/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2018 ND 191
In the Interest of M.S.H., a child
Grand Forks County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
M.S.H., a child, C.H., Sr., father, Respondents
and
F.R.O., mother, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20180172
In the Interest of C.H.H., a child
Grand Forks County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee
C.H.H., Jr., a child, C.H., Sr., father, Respondents
No. 20180173
In the Interest of A.R.G., a child
Grand Forks County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee
A.R.G., a child, C.H., Sr., biological father,
A.G., legal father, Respondents
No. 20180174
Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lolita G. Hartl Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jacqueline A. Gaddie, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Darla J. Schuman, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.
Interest of M.S.H., C.H.H. & A.R.G.
Nos. 20180172, 20180173 & 20180174
[¶1] F.R.O. appealed from a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to M.S.H., C.H.H., and A.R.G. The juvenile court found the children are deprived, the conditions and causes of the deprivation are likely to continue, the children are suffering or will probably suffer serious harm in the future, and that reasonable efforts were made to keep the family together. On appeal, the mother argues there was not clear and convincing evidence to support a termination of her parental rights. We conclude the juvenile court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Steven Marquart, D.J.
[¶3] The Honorable Steven L. Marquart D. J., sitting in place of Jensen, J., disqualified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 ND 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-msh-nd-2018.