Interest of M.R.
This text of 2017 ND 281 (Interest of M.R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 12/7/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2017 ND 281
In the Interest of M.R., a child
Jaimee Towers, Assistant State’s
Attorney for Ward County, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
M.R., a child; C.R., mother, Dena Penton,
Guardian Ad Litem, and Christopher Jones,
Executive Director of the ND Department
of Human Services, Respondents
and
T.W.R., father, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20170363
In the Interest of P.R., a child
P.R., a child; C.R., mother, Dena Penton,
of Human Services, Respondents
No. 20170364
In the Interest of T.R., a child
T.R., a child; C.R., mother, Dena Penton,
No. 20170365
Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Connie Sue Portscheller, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Kyle R. Craig, Minot, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.
Jaimee F. Towers, Ward County Assistant State’s Attorney, Minot, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Interest of M.R., P.R., and T.R.
Nos. 20170363-65
[¶1] The father, T.R., appeals from a juvenile court order terminating his parental rights. The juvenile court found the children were deprived and in foster care for at least 450 out of the previous 660 nights. N.D.C.C. § 27-20-44(1)(c)(2); Interest of A.L. , 2011 ND 189, ¶¶ 10-11, 803 N.W.2d 597 (concluding the district court did not clearly err in terminating parental rights when evidence supported the conclusion the child was deprived and in the custody of social services for 450 of the previous 660 nights). T.R. argues the juvenile court did not adequately explain its findings and did not have an evidentiary basis for finding the children deprived. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 ND 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-mr-nd-2017.