Interest of L.L.D.R.

2021 ND 201
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 17, 2021
Docket20210130
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 ND 201 (Interest of L.L.D.R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Interest of L.L.D.R., 2021 ND 201 (N.D. 2021).

Opinion

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT NOVEMBER 17, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2021 ND 201

In the Interest of L.L.D.R., a child

M.A., Mother, Petitioner and Appellant v. A.R., Father, Respondent and Appellee and North Dakota Department of Human Services; Burleigh County Human Service Zone, Respondents and State of North Dakota Child Support Division, Statutory Real Party in Interest

No. 20210130

Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Jason J. Hammes, Judicial Referee.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Alyssa L. Lovas, Bismarck, N.D., for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, N.D., for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief. Interest of L.L.D.R. No. 20210130

[¶1] M.A., the mother of L.L.D.R., appeals from a juvenile court order declining to terminate the parental rights of A.R., the father of L.L.D.R. The juvenile court found that A.R. “has not abandoned the child and it is not in the child’s best interest that his parental rights be terminated at this time.” On appeal, M.A. argues that the juvenile court erred in finding L.L.D.R. is not an abandoned child and that the court erred in dismissing M.A.’s petition to terminate A.R.’s parental rights. We conclude that the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in its decision to deny termination of A.R.’s parental rights because M.A. did not “establish[] that denying the petition would seriously affect the child’s welfare.” Interest of B.H., 2018 ND 178, ¶ 6, 915 N.W.2d 668. Because this issue is dispositive, we decline to address other issues raised on appeal. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. B.H. (In Re Interest of B.H.)
2018 ND 178 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 ND 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-lldr-nd-2021.