Interest of Leno
This text of 2018 ND 8 (Interest of Leno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 1/22/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2018 ND 8
In the Interest of Patrick Lee Leno
Julie Lawyer, Assistant State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
Patrick Lee Leno, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20170289
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Julie A. Lawyer, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, petitioner and appellee.
Kent M. Morrow, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellant.
Interest of Leno
[¶1] Patrick Leno appeals a district court order continuing his commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. Leno argues the order was not supported by clear and convincing evidence. We conclude the district court’s findings of fact are supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Jon J. Jensen
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 ND 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-leno-nd-2018.