Interest of J.O., L.O., A.O., & A.O.
This text of 2025 ND 119 (Interest of J.O., L.O., A.O., & A.O.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2025 ND 119
Interest of J.O., Child
State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. J.O., child; D.O., father; Barb Oliger, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents and A.M.O., mother, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20250036
Interest of L.O., Child
State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. L.O., child; D.O., father; Barb Oliger, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents and A.M.O., mother, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20250037 Interest of A.O., Child
State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. A.O., child; D.O., father; Barb Oliger, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents and A.M.O., mother, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20250038
Interest of A.O., Child
State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. A.O., child; D.O., father; Barb Oliger, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents and A.M.O., mother, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20250039
Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Mercer County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Todd A. Schwarz, State’s Attorney, Stanton, ND, for petitioner and appellee; on brief.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for repondent and appellant; on brief. Interest of J.O., L.O., A.O., & A.O. Nos. 20250036 – 20250039
[¶1] A.M.O., the mother of the four children in these consolidated cases, appeals from a juvenile court order holding the children are in need of protection. On appeal, she argues the court erred in finding clear and convincing evidence establishes the children are in need of protection.
[¶2] Following a trial in October 2024, the judicial referee concluded the children were in need of protection. A.M.O. requested a district judge review the referee’s order. After conducting a de novo review under N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 13, § 11, the district judge adopted the referee’s findings and order.
[¶3] After reviewing the record and the juvenile court’s findings, we conclude the court’s findings are supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶4] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 ND 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-jo-lo-ao-ao-nd-2025.