Interest of Jane Doe
2017 ND 228, 902 N.W.2d 504, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 228, 2017 WL 4159213
Opinion
[¶ 1] Jane Doe appealed the district court’s order for hospitalization and involuntary treatment with medication. She argues the district court erred in finding her mentally ill and requiring treatment. She also argues the district court erred in granting the request to treat with medications. We conclude the district court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Interest of Jane Doe, 2017 ND 228, 902 N.W.2d 504, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 228, 2017 WL 4159213 (N.D. 2017).
2017 ND 228 (Interest of Jane Doe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pryatel v. Doe (In Re Doe)
2019 ND 23 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)
Interest of Jane Doe
2019 ND 23 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)