Interest of H.D.
This text of 2013 ND 206 (Interest of H.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 11/21/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2013 ND 206
In the Interest of H.D.
William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee
v.
H.D., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20130320
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven E. McCullough, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Gary E. Euren, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for petitioner and appellee.
Douglas W. Nesheim, 15 Ninth Street South, Fargo, N.D. 58103-1830, for respondent and appellant.
Interest of H.D.
[¶1] H.D. appeals a district court’s continuing treatment order and involuntary treatment with medication order. He argues there is insufficient evidence to support the involuntary treatment order and claims there is no clear and convincing evidence showing he requires a higher dosage of medication. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 ND 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-hd-nd-2013.