Interest of G.L.D.
This text of 2016 ND 26 (Interest of G.L.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 2/18/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2016 ND 26
In the Interest of G.L.D.
Brian D. Grosinger,
Assistant State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
G.L.D., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20150245
Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Brian D. Grosinger, Assistant State’s Attorney, 210 Second Avenue N.W., Mandan, N.D. 58554, petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Gregory I. Runge, 1983 East Capitol Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.
Interest of G.L.D.
[¶1] G.L.D. appeals from a district court order denying his request for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. He argues the State failed to prove he has a congenital or acquired condition manifested by a sexual disorder and could commit further acts of sexually predatory conduct. He also argues the district court should not have quashed the witness subpoenas. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4), concluding the district court did not err in finding G.L.D. remains a sexually dangerous individual and did not abuse its discretion when it quashed the subpoenas.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 ND 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-gld-nd-2016.