Interest of D.W. v. Juvenile Officer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Interest of D.W. v. Juvenile Officer

509 S.W.3d 115, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 400, 2016 WL 1643042

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 26, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103084

StatusPublished

This text of 509 S.W.3d 115 (Interest of D.W. v. Juvenile Officer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Interest of D.W. v. Juvenile Officer, 509 S.W.3d 115, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 400, 2016 WL 1643042 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

D.W. (“Juvenile”) appeals from the court’s judgment, adopting the juvenile court commissioner’s finding and recommendations that Juvenile committed what would have been, if he were an adult, tampering in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.080, RSMo (Cum. Supp. 2005). Juvenile was ordered to be committed to the care, custody, and control of the Division of Youth Services for appropriate placement. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

D.W. (“Juvenile”) appeals from the court’s judgment, adopting the juvenile court commissioner’s finding and recommendations that Juvenile committed what would have been, if he were an adult, tampering in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.080, RSMo (Cum. Supp. 2005). Juvenile was ordered to be committed to the care, custody, and control of the Division of Youth Services for appropriate placement. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

509 S.W.3d 115, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 400, 2016 WL 1643042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-dw-v-juvenile-officer-moctapp-2016.