Interest of D.V.A.
This text of 2017 ND 39 (Interest of D.V.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 3/1/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2017 ND 39
In the Interest of D.V.A.
-------------
Julie Lawyer, Assistant State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
D.V.A., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20160315
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gail Hagerty, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ryan A. Keefe, Assistant State’s Attorney, Burleigh County Courthouse, 514 E. Thayer Ave., Bismarck, ND 58501, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Kent M. Morrow, 103 S. Third St., Ste. 6, Bismarck, ND 58501, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.
Interest of D.V.A.
[¶1] D.V.A. appeals from an order denying his application for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. D.V.A. argues the district court erred in denying his application for discharge because the order is not supported by sufficient evidence that he continues to be a sexually dangerous individual under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.3-01(8). We conclude the district court’s findings of fact are supported by clear and convincing evidence, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 ND 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-dva-nd-2017.