Interest of D.V.A.
This text of 2015 ND 84 (Interest of D.V.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 4/15/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2015 ND 84
Interest of D.V.A.
Julie Lawyer, Assistant State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
D.V.A., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20140384
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Julie A. Lawyer, Burleigh County Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, petitioner and appellee.
Kent M. Morrow, 411 North 4th Street, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for respondent and appellant.
[¶1] D.V.A. appealed from a district court order and amended order denying his petition for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. D.V.A. argues the State failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence he is likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct and has serious difficulty controlling his behavior. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 ND 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-dva-nd-2015.