Interest of D.H.

2023 ND 60
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided March 31, 2023·No. 20230057·Published

Opinion

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MARCH 31, 2023 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2023 ND 60

In the Interest of D.H.

Adam D. Miller, PsyD, Petitioner and Appellee v. D.H., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20230057

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Reid A. Brady, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Derek K. Steiner, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.

Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief. Interest of D.H. No. 20230057

[¶1] D.H. appeals from the district court’s order continuing treatment. On appeal, D.H. argues the finding he is mentally ill and a person requiring treatment is not supported by clear and convincing evidence. In mental health commitment cases, we apply the more probing clearly erroneous standard of review. Interest of Doe, 2019 ND 23, ¶ 4, 921 N.W.2d 403. We conclude the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Interest of D.H., 2023 ND 60 (N.D. 2023).

2023 ND 60 (Interest of D.H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pryatel v. Doe (In Re Doe)
2019 ND 23 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)