Interest of D.D.
This text of 2015 ND 24 (Interest of D.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 2/12/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2015 ND 24
In the Interest of D.D., minor child
-------------
McKenzie County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
D.D., child; H.D., child;
C.R., mother; D.D., father, Respondents
C.R., mother, Appellant
No. 20140456
In the Interest of H.D., minor child
No. 20140457
McKenzie County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee
C.R., mother; D.D., father, Respondents
D.D., father, Appellant
_______________________
No. 20140465
McKenzie County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee
C.R., mother; D.D., father, Respondents
D.D., father, Appellant
No. 20140466
Appeals from the Juvenile Court of McKenzie County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Robin Ann Schmidt, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Charles Burke Neff, Assistant State’s Attorney, 201 5th Street NW, Suite 550, Watford City, ND 58854, for petitioner and appellee.
Ashley Marie Gulke, P.O. Box 931, Minot, ND 58702, for appellant C.R.
Richard Robert William Sand, 340 North Main, P.O. Box 1933, Watford City, ND 58854-1933, for appellant D.D.
Interest of D.D.
Nos. 20140456-20140457 and 20140465-20140466
[¶1] C.R., mother, and D.D., father, of minor children D.D. and H.D., each appeal from the district court amended order terminating their parental rights. C.R. argues the district court lacked clear and convincing evidence that deprivation was likely to continue and that the children likely would suffer harm absent termination of parental rights. D.D., father, argues the district court erred when it found the causes of deprivation are likely to continue and that reasonable efforts were made to reunify the family after the children were removed. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 ND 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-dd-nd-2015.